April 1, 2025 – From The Hague to Washington, D.C., political storms are brewing, shaking the foundations of governance on both sides of the Atlantic. In the Netherlands, a seemingly trivial dispute over ribbons has escalated into a full-blown confrontation between the Tweede Kamer and PVV Minister Marjolein Faber, threatening her tenure. Meanwhile, in the United States, former and current President Donald Trump has reignited constitutional debates by musing about a third term, while his administration purges career prosecutors perceived as disloyal.
The Netherlands: Ribbons Ignite a Firestorm
In The Hague, what began as a minor disagreement has spiraled into a high-stakes showdown. Minister Marjolein Faber, a prominent figure in the far-right Party for Freedom (PVV), finds herself at the center of controversy dubbed the “ribbons debacle.” Though details remain murky, the dispute reportedly stems from Faber’s decision to mandate—or perhaps ban—certain symbolic ribbons in official settings, a move critics in the Tweede Kamer, the Dutch House of Representatives, have branded as authoritarian overreach.
The clash has exposed deeper tensions between Faber’s hardline policies and the coalition government’s fragile unity. Opposition lawmakers accuse her of leveraging her position to push a divisive ideological agenda, while her supporters argue she’s defending national values against progressive excess. By Tuesday morning, the rhetoric had escalated to the point of action: a no-confidence motion against Faber was formally tabled, setting the stage for a contentious vote that could topple her from office.
“This isn’t just about ribbons—it’s about power, principle, and the direction of this country,” said one MP, speaking anonymously ahead of the debate. Political analysts suggest that even if Faber survives the motion, the episode could weaken the PVV’s influence within the coalition, with ripple effects for upcoming policy battles.
United States: Trump’s Third-Term Trial Balloon
Across the ocean, Donald Trump continues to dominate headlines with a provocative suggestion that has constitutional scholars scrambling for their textbooks. Speaking at a rally in Ohio on Monday night, the recently re-elected president floated the idea of seeking a third term, a notion that would defy the 22nd Amendment, which limits U.S. presidents to two terms. “I’ve done so much—maybe we need more time to finish the job,” Trump quipped to a roaring crowd, leaving it unclear whether he was serious or merely stoking his base.
The remark has reignited a perennial debate about executive power in America. Legal experts are divided: some argue the Constitution’s text is ironclad, while others point to historical precedents of bending norms—like Franklin Roosevelt’s four terms before the amendment’s ratification in 1951. Trump’s allies in Congress have already begun testing the waters, with one House Republican suggesting a repeal of the 22nd Amendment might be “worth discussing.”
Critics, however, see the comment as part of a broader pattern of norm-breaking. “This is a dangerous flirtation with autocracy,” warned Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) in a statement Tuesday. Public reaction is similarly polarized, with social media ablaze over whether Trump’s musings are a masterstroke of political theater or a genuine threat to democracy.
Loyalty Purge at Justice
Adding fuel to the fire, the Trump administration announced the dismissal of several career Justice Department prosecutors this week, a move insiders say reflects a loyalty test gone nuclear. The fired officials, some with decades of service, were reportedly seen as insufficiently aligned with Trump’s agenda, particularly his calls to investigate political rivals. Attorney General nominee Mike Davis defended the decision, stating, “The president needs a team he can trust to drain the swamp.”
The purge has drawn sharp rebukes from legal circles and former DOJ officials, who warn it undermines the department’s independence. “This isn’t about loyalty—it’s about turning justice into a political weapon,” said Preet Bharara, a former U.S. Attorney ousted by Trump in 2017. Democrats in Congress are now vowing to investigate, though their leverage in a Republican-controlled Senate remains limited.
A Tale of Two Crises
While the Dutch “ribbons debacle” and Trump’s third-term gambit differ in scale and stakes, they share a common thread: the erosion of political norms under pressure from populist figures. In The Hague, Faber’s fate hangs in the balance as lawmakers weigh ideology against stability. In Washington, Trump’s provocations test the resilience of a constitutional framework already strained by years of partisan warfare.
As debates rage in both capitals, the coming days promise more drama. Will Faber weather the no-confidence storm? Can Trump’s third-term rhetoric translate into action? For now, the world watches as these parallel sagas unfold, each a microcosm of the turbulent politics defining 2025.
———-
First published in this link of The European Times.
