Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).
Google Scholar
Theodoris, C. V. et al. Transfer learning enables predictions in network biology. Nature 618, 616–624 (2023).
Google Scholar
Brixi, G. et al. Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2. Nature 652, 1349–1361 (2026).
Avsec, Z. et al. Advancing regulatory variant effect prediction with AlphaGenome. Nature 649, 1206–1218 (2026).
Google Scholar
Bunne, C. et al. How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: priorities and opportunities. Cell 187, 7045–7063 (2024).This perspective article defines the concept of the AIVC and outlines the design principles and collaborative strategies needed to realize AI-driven, multiscale simulations of a living system.
Google Scholar
Karr, J. R. et al. A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype. Cell 150, 389–401 (2012).This pioneering study presents the first mechanistic whole-cell model that integrates all molecular processes of M. genitalium using diverse mathematical formalisms to unify fundamentally different cellular processes and experimental measurements, enabling genotype-to-phenotype prediction.
Google Scholar
Macklin, D. N. et al. Simultaneous cross-evaluation of heterogeneous E. coli datasets via mechanistic simulation. Science 369, eaav3751 (2020).
Lu, H., Kerkhoven, E. J. & Nielsen, J. Multiscale models quantifying yeast physiology: towards a whole-cell model. Trends Biotechnol. 40, 291–305 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sanchez, B. J. et al. Improving the phenotype predictions of a yeast genome-scale metabolic model by incorporating enzymatic constraints. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 935 (2017).
Google Scholar
Elsemman, I. E. et al. Whole-cell modeling in yeast predicts compartment-specific proteome constraints that drive metabolic strategies. Nat. Commun. 13, 801 (2022).
Google Scholar
Oftadeh, O. et al. A genome-scale metabolic model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that integrates expression constraints and reaction thermodynamics. Nat. Commun. 12, 4790 (2021).
Google Scholar
Adduri, A. K. et al. Predicting cellular responses to perturbation across diverse contexts with State. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.26.661135 (2025). This study introduces State, a scalable AI framework trained on perturbation transcriptomic data, from over 100 million cells, that predicts cellular responses across unseen contexts, advancing the dynamic modelling of perturbation effects central to AIVC development.
Sun, R. et al. A perturbation proteomics-based foundation model for virtual cell construction. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.07.637070 (2025). This study introduces ProteinTalks, a neural ordinary differential equation-based foundation model trained on 38 million perturbed protein measurements, which learns cellular protein network dynamics to predict drug efficacy, synergy and resistance, laying a proteome-centric foundation for virtual cell development.
Jakobson, C. M. et al. A genome-to-proteome map reveals how natural variants drive proteome diversity and shape fitness. Science 390, eadu3198 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rizvi, S. A. et al. Scaling large language models for next-generation single-cell analysis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.14.648850 (2025).
Qian, L., Dong, Z. & Guo, T. Grow AI virtual cells: three data pillars and closed-loop learning. Cell Res. 35, 319–321 (2025). This perspective article proposes the ‘three data pillars’—a priori knowledge, static architecture and dynamic states—as the foundation for building AIVCs, and introduces closed-loop active learning systems to autonomously refine virtual cell models.
Guo, T., Steen, J. A. & Mann, M. Mass-spectrometry-based proteomics: from single cells to clinical applications. Nature 638, 901–911 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bauermeister, A., Mannochio-Russo, H., Costa-Lotufo, L. V., Jarmusch, A. K. & Dorrestein, P. C. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics in microbiome investigations. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 143–160 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cui, H. et al. Towards multimodal foundation models in molecular cell biology. Nature 640, 623–633 (2025).
Google Scholar
Song, L., Segal, E. & Xing, E. Toward AI-driven digital organism: multiscale foundation models for predicting, simulating and programming biology at all levels. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06993 (2024).
Acosta, J. N., Falcone, G. J., Rajpurkar, P. & Topol, E. J. Multimodal biomedical AI. Nat. Med. 28, 1773–1784 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lin, Z. et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science 379, 1123–1130 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, L. et al. Diffusion models: a comprehensive survey of methods and applications. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 1–39 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lipman, Y., Chen, R. T., Ben-Hamu, H., Nickel, M. & Le, M. Flow matching for generative modeling. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747 (2022).
Shazeer, N. et al. Outrageously large neural networks: the sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.06538 (2017).
Fedus, W., Zoph, B. & Shazeer, N. Switch transformers: scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 23, 5232–5270 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bai, L. et al. Intern-s1: a scientific multimodal foundation model. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15763 (2025).
Li, Y. et al. Uni-moe: scaling unified multimodal llms with mixture of experts. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 47, 3424–3439 (2025).
Mroueh, Y. Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards: GRPO’s effective loss, dynamics, and success amplification. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06639 (2025).
Cherry, J. M. et al. SGD: Saccharomyces Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 73–79 (1998).
Google Scholar
Ramirez-Gaona, M. et al. YMDB 2.0: a significantly expanded version of the yeast metabolome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D440–D445 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kim, H. et al. YeastNet v3: a public database of data-specific and integrated functional gene networks for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D731–D736 (2014).
Google Scholar
Breker, M., Gymrek, M., Moldavski, O. & Schuldiner, M. LoQAtE—localization and quantitation atlas of the yeast proteome. A new tool for multiparametric dissection of single-protein behavior in response to biological perturbations in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D726–D730 (2014).
Google Scholar
Koh, J. L. et al. CYCLoPs: a comprehensive database constructed from automated analysis of protein abundance and subcellular localization patterns in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 5, 1223–1232 (2015).
Google Scholar
Costanzo, M. et al. A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function. Science 353, aaf1420 (2016). This landmark study maps nearly 1 million genetic interactions in yeast, revealing the global wiring diagram of cellular function and establishing a quantitative framework for decoding genotype-to-phenotype relationships.
Usaj, M. et al. TheCellMap.org: a web-accessible database for visualizing and mining the Global Yeast Genetic Interaction Network. G3 7, 1539–1549 (2017).
Google Scholar
Braberg, H. et al. Genetic interaction mapping informs integrative structure determination of protein complexes. Science 370, eaaz4910 (2020).
Michaelis, A. C. et al. The social and structural architecture of the yeast protein interactome. Nature 624, 192–200 (2023).Using high-throughput affinity purification–mass spectrometry, this work generates a nearly complete yeast protein–protein interaction map, uncovering the dense and modular architecture of the cellular interactome.
Google Scholar
Peter, J. et al. Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates. Nature 556, 339–344 (2018).This population-scale genomic analysis of 1,011 yeast isolates reveals the evolutionary trajectories and domestication history of S. cerevisiae, providing a comprehensive resource for genotype–phenotype studies.
Google Scholar
Caudal, E. et al. Pan-transcriptome reveals a large accessory genome contribution to gene expression variation in yeast. Nat. Genet. 56, 1278–1287 (2024).
Google Scholar
Muenzner, J. et al. Natural proteome diversity links aneuploidy tolerance to protein turnover. Nature 630, 149–157 (2024).
Google Scholar
Loegler, V. et al. From genotype to phenotype with 1,086 near telomere-to-telomere yeast genomes. Nature 648, 649–658 (2025).
Puddu, F. et al. Genome architecture and stability in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae knockout collection. Nature 573, 416–420 (2019).
Google Scholar
Messner, C. B. et al. The proteomic landscape of genome-wide genetic perturbations. Cell 186, 2018–2034.e21 (2023).
Google Scholar
Schulte, U. et al. Mitochondrial complexome reveals quality-control pathways of protein import. Nature 614, 153–159 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tengolics, R. et al. The metabolic domestication syndrome of budding yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2313354121 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mulleder, M. et al. Functional metabolomics describes the yeast biosynthetic regulome. Cell 167, 553–565.e12 (2016).
Google Scholar
Galardini, M. et al. The impact of the genetic background on gene deletion phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e8831 (2019).
Google Scholar
Aulakh, S. K. et al. The molecular landscape of cellular metal ion biology. Cell Syst. 16, 101319 (2025).
Luo, R. et al. BioGPT: generative pre-trained transformer for biomedical text generation and mining. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbac409 (2022).
Bachman, J. A., Gyori, B. M. & Sorger, P. K. Automated assembly of molecular mechanisms at scale from text mining and curated databases. Mol. Syst. Biol. 19, e11325 (2023).
Google Scholar
Qu, S. et al. Automating exploratory multiomics research via language models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07591 (2025).
Chen, R., Zhou, J. & Chen, B. Imputing abundance of over 2,500 surface proteins from single-cell transcriptomes with context-agnostic zero-shot deep ensembles. Cell Syst. 15, 869–884.e6 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hanhart, D., Gossi, F., Rapsomaniki, M. A., Kruithof-de Julio, M. & Chouvardas, P. ScLinear predicts protein abundance at single-cell resolution. Commun. Biol. 7, 267 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zelezniak, A. et al. Machine learning predicts the yeast metabolome from the quantitative proteome of kinase knockouts. Cell Syst. 7, 269–283.e6 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhu, S., Zhu, Y., Tao, M. & Qiu, P. Diffusion generative modeling for spatially resolved gene expression inference from histology images. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15598 (2025).
Bressan, D., Battistoni, G. & Hannon, G. J. The dawn of spatial omics. Science 381, eabq4964 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, A. et al. Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays. Cell 185, 1777–1792.e21 (2022).
Google Scholar
Christopher, J. A., Geladaki, A., Dawson, C. S., Vennard, O. L. & Lilley, K. S. Subcellular transcriptomics and proteomics: a comparative methods review. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 21, 100186 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hein, M. Y. et al. Global organelle profiling reveals subcellular localization and remodeling at proteome scale. Cell 188, 1137–1155.e20 (2025).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-D. et al. Microscopy-guided subcellular proteomic discovery by high-speed ultra-content photo-biotinylation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.27.573388 (2023).
Liu, Z. et al. Bioorthogonal photocatalytic proximity labeling in primary living samples. Nat. Commun. 15, 2712 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. et al. Genetically encoded bioorthogonal tryptophan decaging in living cells. Nat. Chem. 16, 533–542 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bai, Y. et al. Expanded vacuum-stable gels for multiplexed high-resolution spatial histopathology. Nat. Commun. 14, 4013 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H. et al. TEMI: tissue-expansion mass-spectrometry imaging. Nat. Methods 22, 1051–1058 (2025).
Google Scholar
Chan, Y. H. et al. Gel-assisted mass spectrometry imaging enables sub-micrometer spatial lipidomics. Nat. Commun. 15, 5036 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dong, Z. et al. Spatial proteomics of single cells and organelles on tissue slides using filter-aided expansion proteomics. Nat. Commun. 15, 9378 (2024).
Google Scholar
Giaever, G. et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418, 387–391 (2002).
Google Scholar
Ohnuki, S. et al. Phenotypic diagnosis of lineage and differentiation during sake yeast breeding. G3 7, 2807–2820 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ohya, Y. et al. High-dimensional and large-scale phenotyping of yeast mutants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 19015–19020 (2005).
Google Scholar
Chica, N. et al. Time-resolved functional genomics using deep learning reveals a global hierarchical control of autophagy. Nat. Cell Biol. 28, 465–479 (2026).
Takei, Y. et al. Integrated spatial genomics reveals global architecture of single nuclei. Nature 590, 344–350 (2021).
Google Scholar
Huh, W. K. et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425, 686–691 (2003).
Google Scholar
Natter, K. et al. The spatial organization of lipid synthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived from large scale green fluorescent protein tagging and high resolution microscopy. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 662–672 (2005).
Google Scholar
Litsios, A. et al. Proteome-scale movements and compartment connectivity during the eukaryotic cell cycle. Cell 187, 1490–1507.e21 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bond, C., Santiago-Ruiz, A. N., Tang, Q. & Lakadamyali, M. Technological advances in super-resolution microscopy to study cellular processes. Mol. Cell 82, 315–332 (2022).
Google Scholar
Unterauer, E. M. et al. Spatial proteomics in neurons at single-protein resolution. Cell 187, 1785–1800.e16 (2024).This study develops SUM-PAINT, a high-throughput super-resolution method achieving virtually unlimited multiplexing at sub-15-nm resolution and revealing a new VGLUT1+ Gephyrin+ synapse subtype.
Google Scholar
Nogales, E. & Mahamid, J. Bridging structural and cell biology with cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 628, 47–56 (2024).
Google Scholar
Young, L. N. & Villa, E. Bringing structure to cell biology with cryo-electron tomography. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 52, 573–595 (2023).
Google Scholar
Peddie, C. J. et al. Volume electron microscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 51 (2022).
Google Scholar
McCafferty, C. L. et al. Integrating cellular electron microscopy with multimodal data to explore biology across space and time. Cell 187, 563–584 (2024).
Google Scholar
Nesic, N. et al. Automated segmentation of cell organelles in volume electron microscopy using deep learning. Microsc. Res. Tech. 87, 1718–1732 (2024).
Google Scholar
He, K. et al. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (eds Dana, K. et al.) 16000–16009 (IEEE, 2022).
Hu, B. et al. High-resolution spatially resolved proteomics of complex tissues based on microfluidics and transfer learning. Cell 188, 734–748.e22 (2025).This study presents PLATO, a microfluidics-based and AI-based framework enabling high-resolution spatial proteomics across whole tissues and revealing distinct tumour subtypes in human breast cancer.
Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. Multimodal AI-enabled mass spectrometry-based expansion proteomics for whole-slide at single-cell resolution. Preprint at LangTaoSha https://doi.org/10.65215/LTSpreprints.2026.02.20.000134 (2026).
Shih, M.-L., Su, S.-Y., Kopf, J. & Huang, J.-B. 3D photography using context-aware layered depth inpainting. In Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (eds Liu, C. et al.) 8028–8038 (IEEE, 2020).
Hammer, S. K. & Avalos, J. L. Harnessing yeast organelles for metabolic engineering. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 823–832 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kemmeren, P. et al. Large-scale genetic perturbations reveal regulatory networks and an abundance of gene-specific repressors. Cell 157, 740–752 (2014).
Google Scholar
Nadal-Ribelles, M. et al. A single-cell resolved genotype-phenotype map using genome-wide genetic and environmental perturbations. Nat. Commun. 16, 2645 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ozturk, M. et al. Proteome effects of genome-wide single gene perturbations. Nat. Commun. 13, 6153 (2022).
Google Scholar
Decourty, L., Malabat, C., Frachon, E., Jacquier, A. & Saveanu, C. Investigation of RNA metabolism through large-scale genetic interaction profiling in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 8535–8555 (2021).
Google Scholar
di Bernardo, D. et al. Chemogenomic profiling on a genome-wide scale using reverse-engineered gene networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 377–383 (2005).
Google Scholar
Parsons, A. B. et al. Exploring the mode-of-action of bioactive compounds by chemical-genetic profiling in yeast. Cell 126, 611–625 (2006).
Google Scholar
Leutert, M., Barente, A. S., Fukuda, N. K., Rodriguez-Mias, R. A. & Villen, J. The regulatory landscape of the yeast phosphoproteome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1761–1773 (2023).
Google Scholar
Messner, C. B. et al. Ultra-fast proteomics with Scanning SWATH. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 846–854 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lee, A. Y. et al. Mapping the cellular response to small molecules using chemogenomic fitness signatures. Science 344, 208–211 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gasch, A. P. et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 4241–4257 (2000).
Google Scholar
Bennett, C. B. et al. Genes required for ionizing radiation resistance in yeast. Nat. Genet. 29, 426–434 (2001).
Google Scholar
Klein, D. et al. CellFlow enables generative single-cell phenotype modeling with flow matching. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.11.648220 (2025).
DeMeo, B. et al. Active learning framework leveraging transcriptomics identifies modulators of disease phenotypes. Science 390, eadi8577 (2025).
Google Scholar
Xu, Y. et al. LUMI-lab: a foundation model-driven autonomous platform enabling discovery of ionizable lipid designs for mRNA delivery. Cell 189, 1620–1635.e25 (2026).
Google Scholar
Burger, B. et al. A mobile robotic chemist. Nature 583, 237–241 (2020).This pioneering demonstration of an autonomous mobile robotic chemist establishes a closed-loop system for self-driven experimentation, foreshadowing active-learning frameworks for AIVC evolution.
Google Scholar
Coley, C. W. et al. A robotic platform for flow synthesis of organic compounds informed by AI planning. Science 365, eaax1566 (2019).
Zhang, C. et al. Yeast9: a consensus genome-scale metabolic model for S. cerevisiae curated by the community. Mol. Syst. Biol. 20, 1134–1150 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ji, X. et al. Uni-mol2: exploring molecular pretraining model at scale. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14969 (2024).
Hartwell, L. H. Yeast and cancer. Biosci. Rep. 24, 523–544 (2004).
Google Scholar
Neiman, A. M. Sporulation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 189, 737–765 (2011).
Google Scholar
Winzeler, E. A. et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285, 901–906 (1999).
Google Scholar
Mulleder, M. et al. A prototrophic deletion mutant collection for yeast metabolomics and systems biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1176–1178 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zhu, H. et al. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science 293, 2101–2105 (2001).
Google Scholar
Sopko, R. et al. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol. Cell 21, 319–330 (2006).
Google Scholar
Ross-Macdonald, P. et al. Large-scale analysis of the yeast genome by transposon tagging and gene disruption. Nature 402, 413–418 (1999).
Google Scholar
Weill, U. et al. Genome-wide SWAp-Tag yeast libraries for proteome exploration. Nat. Methods 15, 617–622 (2018).
Google Scholar
Roy, K. R. et al. Multiplexed precision genome editing with trackable genomic barcodes in yeast. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 512–520 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tong, A. H. et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294, 2364–2368 (2001).
Google Scholar
Pan, X. et al. dSLAM analysis of genome-wide genetic interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods 41, 206–221 (2007).
Google Scholar
Boone, C., Bussey, H. & Andrews, B. J. Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 437–449 (2007).
Google Scholar
Turco, G. et al. Global analysis of the yeast knockout phenome. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg5702 (2023).
Google Scholar
Engel, S. R. et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database provides mutant phenotype data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D433–D436 (2010).
Google Scholar
Engel, S. R. et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database: advances in genome annotation, expanded biochemical pathways, and other key enhancements. Genetics 229, iyae185 (2025).
Song, G. et al. Integration of new alternative reference strain genome sequences into the Saccharomyces Genome Database. Database 2016, baw074 (2016).
Yue, J. X. et al. Contrasting evolutionary genome dynamics between domesticated and wild yeasts. Nat. Genet. 49, 913–924 (2017).
Google Scholar
O’Donnell, S. et al. Telomere-to-telomere assemblies of 142 strains characterize the genome structural landscape in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Genet. 55, 1390–1399 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kachroo, A. H. et al. Evolution. Systematic humanization of yeast genes reveals conserved functions and genetic modularity. Science 348, 921–925 (2015).
Google Scholar
Laurent, J. M. et al. Humanization of yeast genes with multiple human orthologs reveals functional divergence between paralogs. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000627 (2020).
Google Scholar
Persson, E. & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. InParanoiDB 9: ortholog groups for protein domains and full-length proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 435, 168001 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kachroo, A. H., Vandeloo, M., Greco, B. M. & Abdullah, M. Humanized yeast to model human biology, disease and evolution. Dis. Model. Mech. 15, dmm049309 (2022).
Paddon, C. J. & Keasling, J. D. Semi-synthetic artemisinin: a model for the use of synthetic biology in pharmaceutical development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 355–367 (2014).
Google Scholar
Richardson, S. M. et al. Design of a synthetic yeast genome. Science 355, 1040–1044 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dai, J., Boeke, J. D., Luo, Z., Jiang, S. & Cai, Y. Sc3.0: revamping and minimizing the yeast genome. Genome Biol. 21, 205 (2020).
Google Scholar
Luo, X. et al. Complete biosynthesis of cannabinoids and their unnatural analogues in yeast. Nature 567, 123–126 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. & Keasling, J. D. Engineering cellular metabolism. Cell 164, 1185–1197 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, G. et al. Yeast metabolism adaptation for efficient terpenoids synthesis via isopentenol utilization. Nat. Commun. 15, 9844 (2024).
Google Scholar
Miao, Z. et al. ScRAPdb: an integrated pan-omics database for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae reference assembly panel. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D852–D863 (2025).
Google Scholar
King, N. L. et al. Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome with PeptideAtlas. Genome Biol. 7, R106 (2006).
Dalla-Torre, H. et al. Nucleotide Transformer: building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics. Nat. Methods 22, 287–297 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhou, J. & Troyanskaya, O. G. Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model. Nat. Methods 12, 931–934 (2015).
Google Scholar
Avsec, Z. et al. Effective gene expression prediction from sequence by integrating long-range interactions. Nat. Methods 18, 1196–1203 (2021).
Google Scholar
Skribbe, M. et al. A comprehensive Schizosaccharomyces pombe atlas of physical transcription factor interactions with proteins and chromatin. Mol. Cell 85, 1426–1444.e8 (2025).
Google Scholar
Hao, M. et al. Large-scale foundation model on single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 21, 1481–1491 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cui, H. et al. scGPT: toward building a foundation model for single-cell multi-omics using generative AI. Nat. Methods 21, 1470–1480 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fu, X. et al. A foundation model of transcription across human cell types. Nature 637, 965–973 (2025).
Google Scholar
Corso, G., Stärk, H., Jing, B., Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T. DiffDock: diffusion steps, twists, and turns for molecular docking. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Nickel, M. et al.) (ICLR, 2023).
Stärk, H., Ganea, O., Pattanaik, L., Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T. EquiBind: geometric deep learning for drug binding structure prediction. In Proc. 39th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Chaudhuri, K. et al.) 20503–20521 (PMLR, 2022).
Chen, M. et al. Multifaceted protein-protein interaction prediction based on Siamese residual RCNN. Bioinformatics 35, i305–i314 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Wang, J., Cao, Z. & Barati Farimani, A. Molecular contrastive learning of representations via graph neural networks. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 279–287 (2022).
Google Scholar
Falk, T. et al. U-Net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry. Nat. Methods 16, 67–70 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pachitariu, M. & Stringer, C. Cellpose 2.0: how to train your own model. Nat. Methods 19, 1634–1641 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H., Cheveralls, K. C., Leonetti, M. D. & Royer, L. A. Self-supervised deep learning encodes high-resolution features of protein subcellular localization. Nat. Methods 19, 995–1003 (2022).
Google Scholar
Palma, A., Theis, F. J. & Lotfollahi, M. Predicting cell morphological responses to perturbations using generative modeling. Nat. Commun. 16, 505 (2025).
Google Scholar
Source:
www.nature.com